MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415681722 · doi:10.1071/mj25003

Modified early obstetric warning system as a predictor of maternal morbidity in Papua New Guinea: a prospective study in Alotau Provincial Hospital

2025· article· en· W4415681722 on OpenAlexaff
Rodney Talo, Ian Umo, Grace Kariwiga

Bibliographic record

VenuePapua New Guinea medical journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsProvincial Health Services Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaternal morbidityObservational studyProspective cohort studyPsychological interventionEarly warning scorePregnancyWarning systemMaternal deathEmergency department

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Maternal mortality remains a significant global health issue, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Papua New Guinea (PNG), where the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) remains high. The Modified Early Obstetric Warning System (MEOWS), a track-and-trigger tool, has been adopted internationally to facilitate early detection of obstetric complications. This study aims to validate MEOWS as a tool for predicting maternal morbidity, emergency interventions and mortality in a resource-limited setting at Alotau Provincial Hospital in PNG. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted at Alotau Provincial Hospital over 17 months (July 2018 to November 2019). All pregnant women between 20 weeks of gestation and 6 weeks postpartum who required inpatient care were included. The MEOWS chart was used to monitor physiological parameters, triggering alerts for potential morbidity. The primary outcomes were maternal morbidity, emergency interventions, and mortality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the tool’s effectiveness. Results A total of 676 MEOWS charts were analysed. Of these, 145 women (21%) triggered an alert. Women who triggered alerts had a significantly higher risk of developing obstetric morbidity (20% vs < 1%, P < 0.0000001), requiring high dependency unit (HDU) admission (19% vs < 1%, P < 0.0000001), and experiencing maternal death (8% vs < 1%, P < 0.0000001). The most common morbidities were hypertensive disorders (40%), haemorrhage (27%), and maternal sepsis (27%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the MEOWS chart were 97%, with a PPV of 88% and NPV of 99%. Conclusion The MEOWS chart demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in predicting maternal morbidity in a low-resource setting. The tool successfully identified women at risk of severe complications, including maternal death. These findings support the implementation of MEOWS in similar resource-limited settings, where timely interventions could significantly reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapua New Guinea medical journal→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→