MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415687766 · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.115036

High strain-rate deformation of laser powder bed fused Ti5553 alloy

2025· article· en· W4415687766 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Karimi, A.G. Odeshi, Mohsen Mohammadi, Hamed Asgari

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials & Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersUniversity of WaterlooNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsElectron backscatter diffractionSplit-Hopkinson pressure barStrain rateDynamic recrystallizationGrain sizeSofteningDeformation (meteorology)Ductility (Earth science)Adiabatic shear band

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• LPBF-Ti5553 alloy tested under dynamic impact loading at strain rates of 900-2150 s⁻¹. • Strength and ductility increased simultaneously with strain rate. • Grain refinement and texture softening contributed to enhanced plasticity. • EBSD revealed lattice distortion and dislocation accumulation. This study investigates the dynamic impact loading behavior of laser powder bed fused (LPBF) Ti-5Al-5 V-5Mo-3Cr (Ti5553) alloy using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) system at strain rates of 900–2150 s −1 . Microstructural characterization by OM, SEM, XRD, and EBSD was performed to assess the grain morphology, crystallographic texture, and deformation mechanisms. Results revealed a strain-rate-dependent increase in the yield strength, ultimate compressive strength (UCS), and ductility, attributed to strain-rate hardening, grain refinement, thermal softening, and a texture transition toward the 〈110〉 orientation. The UCS increased from 1230 MPa to 1385 MPa (12.6 %) as the strain rate rose from 900 s −1 to 2150 s −1 , while strain rose from 0.075 to 0.196, indicating enhanced ductility and impact resistance. EBSD revealed progressive lattice distortion and dislocation accumulation with increasing strain rate. Macro and micro texture analyses showed a transition from a solidification-driven 〈001〉 texture to a strain-induced 〈110〉 orientation, suggesting that slip along {1 1 0}〈111〉 systems can be a major deformation mechanism. No adiabatic shear banding was detected, confirming thermal and microstructural stability under dynamic impact loading under the tested conditions. These findings provide new insights into the high strain-rate response of LPBF-Ti5553 and support its potential for demanding aerospace and structural applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials & DesignSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207