MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415687788 · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107456

Global threats of bean fly [Ophiomyia spp.] on common bean: Perspectives and limitations of management practices

2025· article· en· W4415687788 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lawrence O. Onyango, Dennis Beesigamukama, Abdullahi A. Yusuf, Birachi Eliud Abucheli, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Shaphan Y. Chia, Arinaitwe Warren, María Isabel Gómez, Sunday Ekesi, Samira A. Mohamed, Ayuka T. Fombong, Sevgan Subramanian, Chrysantus M. Tanga

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Protection · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEduCanadaAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitCurt Bergfors FoundationDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidGovernment of the Republic of KenyaNovo Nordisk FondenBundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und EntwicklungNovo NordiskMinistère de l'Europe et des Affaires ÉtrangèresBill and Melinda Gates FoundationEuropean CommissionIKEA FoundationStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteRockefeller Foundation
KeywordsFood securityAgricultureSustainable managementEcosystemProductivityIntegrated pest managementPopulationCrop protectionDistribution (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCrop ProtectionSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207