Advancing civil infrastructure with digital twins: a review of applications and challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The digital twins (DTs) technology has emerged as a ground-breaking approach in the management and maintenance of civil infrastructure, providing a virtual representation of physical systems which are continuously updated with realtime data from IoT sensors and simulations. Initially introduced in the manufacturing sector, the concept of digital twins has been extended to civil engineering, offering a significant potential for real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, optimized asset management, and enhanced decision-making. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the applications of the digital twins technology in civil infrastructure, with a particular focus on structural health monitoring (SHM), predictive maintenance, smart city frameworks, and disaster response systems. By reviewing existing methodologies, case studies, and practical implementations, this paper highlights the transformative impact of DTs in improving the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of infrastructure systems, including bridges, buildings, and transportation networks. Despite the numerous advantages of DTs, several challenges impede their widespread adoption in civil engineering. These challenges include high implementation costs due to the need for sophisticated sensors, high-performance computing, and advanced simulation tools. Additionally, data integration and interoperability issues between various data sources and platforms hinder seamless adoption. Cybersecurity risks associated with real-time monitoring systems and the protection of critical infrastructure are also discussed. This survey identifies these barriers and outlines the necessary technological advancements which may help overcoming the barriers. These include standardized data formats, enhanced AI-driven predictive models, and scalable cloud solutions, among others. This paper concludes by highlighting future research directions to address the identified challenges, emphasizing the need for collaboration across academia, industry, and government to fully unlock the potential of DTs technology. With continued advancements in machine learning, edge computing, and secure data protocols, DTs are poised to revolutionize infrastructure management, contributing to smarter, safer, and more efficiently built environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".