MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415692499 · doi:10.3846/jcem.2025.24921

Advancing civil infrastructure with digital twins: a review of applications and challenges

2025· article· en· W4415692499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Civil Engineering and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityCloud computingSustainabilityCivil infrastructureResilience (materials science)Data sharingBig dataTransformative learningScalability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The digital twins (DTs) technology has emerged as a ground-breaking approach in the management and maintenance of civil infrastructure, providing a virtual representation of physical systems which are continuously updated with realtime data from IoT sensors and simulations. Initially introduced in the manufacturing sector, the concept of digital twins has been extended to civil engineering, offering a significant potential for real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, optimized asset management, and enhanced decision-making. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the applications of the digital twins technology in civil infrastructure, with a particular focus on structural health monitoring (SHM), predictive maintenance, smart city frameworks, and disaster response systems. By reviewing existing methodologies, case studies, and practical implementations, this paper highlights the transformative impact of DTs in improving the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of infrastructure systems, including bridges, buildings, and transportation networks. Despite the numerous advantages of DTs, several challenges impede their widespread adoption in civil engineering. These challenges include high implementation costs due to the need for sophisticated sensors, high-performance computing, and advanced simulation tools. Additionally, data integration and interoperability issues between various data sources and platforms hinder seamless adoption. Cybersecurity risks associated with real-time monitoring systems and the protection of critical infrastructure are also discussed. This survey identifies these barriers and outlines the necessary technological advancements which may help overcoming the barriers. These include standardized data formats, enhanced AI-driven predictive models, and scalable cloud solutions, among others. This paper concludes by highlighting future research directions to address the identified challenges, emphasizing the need for collaboration across academia, industry, and government to fully unlock the potential of DTs technology. With continued advancements in machine learning, edge computing, and secure data protocols, DTs are poised to revolutionize infrastructure management, contributing to smarter, safer, and more efficiently built environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it