Childhood gut microbiome is linked to internalizing symptoms at school age via the functional connectome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microbiome-gut-brain-axis plays a critical role in mental health. However, research linking the microbiome to brain function is limited, particularly during development, when tremendous plasticity occurs and many mental health issues, like depression and anxiety, initially manifest. Further complicating attempts to understand interactions between the brain and microbiome is the complex and multidimensional nature of both systems. In the current observational study (N = 55), we use sparse partial least squares to identify linear combinations of brain networks (brain signatures) derived from resting state fMRI scans at age 6 years that maximally covary with internalizing symptoms at age 7.5 years, before identifying microbe abundances (microbial profiles) derived from 16S rRNA sequencing of stool samples at age 2 years that maximally covary with those brain signatures. Finally, we test whether any early microbial profiles are indirectly associated with later internalizing symptoms via the brain signatures, highlighting potential microbial programming effects. We find that microbes in the Clostridiales order and Lachnospiraceae family are associated with internalizing symptoms in middle childhood through connectivity alterations within emotion-related brain networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".