MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415693216 · doi:10.52403/ijrr.20251045

Surgical Scar Endometriosis After Abdominal Myomectomy: A Case Report

2025· article· en· W4415693216 on OpenAlexaff
Rohini Rupan, Aaron Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research and Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsGeorgetown Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisUterusAbdominal wallScar tissueLaparotomySurgical procedures

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endometriosis is a persistent gynecological disorder defined by the existence of functioning endometrial glands and stroma beyond the uterine cavity. Globally, estimates suggest that 10–15% of all women of reproductive age are affected by endometriosis. Surgical scar endometriosis is a rare condition that presents in patients after cesarean section or myomectomy, where the endometrial tissue implants in the surgical scar. We present the case of a 35-year-old female complaining of cyclical abdominal pain, oozing dark red blood from the surgical site, and a lump on the left side of a Pfannenstiel incision. She had undergone myomectomy one year ago. Keywords: Endometriosis, myomectomy, surgical scar, Pfannenstiel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.430 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research and ReviewSame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207