MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415697223 · doi:10.1177/07334648251394117

Discrimination, Disclosure, and Working in Old Age: A Queer Life Course Analysis of Employment Trajectories Among LGBTQ+ Older Adults in Canada

2025· article· en· W4415697223 on OpenAlexaffabout
Celeste Pang, Ellie Maclennan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Gerontology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife course approachIdentity (music)Social securityWorking lifeFinancial securityQueerDifferential (mechanical device)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While there has been an increase in research examining LGBTQ+ employment experiences, questions remain about the compounding effects of discrimination on the longer-term career trajectories and economic security of these older adults, as well as the intersections of ageism, homophobia, and transphobia. Based on interviews with 48 LGBTQ+ older adults from across Canada, this paper examines employment experiences over their life course and in older age. The paper explores three main themes of (1) access to education and its differential impacts; (2) navigating identity and disclosure; and (3) working into older age, and demonstrates the compounding impacts of social and workplace discrimination on career trajectories and economic security later in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied GerontologySame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207