MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415699357 · doi:10.63105/49.487.2

Acidez estomacal

2025· article· es· W4415699357 on OpenAlexaff
MT Martínez-peñalver Mateos, M Arana Zumaquero, Patricia Isabel Mestre Lerma, P. Gómez González del Tánago, Marta Sojo Elías, Iziar Concepción Andrés, Elva Ortega Polar, Francisco Javier Panadero Carlavilla

Bibliographic record

VenuePanorama actual del medicamento · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnalsNew delhiTropical medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al hablar de acidez estomacal o pirosis nos referimos a la sensación molesta, incluso dolorosa, de ardor retroesternal o sensación de quemazón que asciende hacia cuello y garganta. Se puede acompañar de regurgitación de contenido gástrico o de líquido de sabor ácido o agrio en la boca. Este proceso ocurre cuando se deteriora la función barrera de la zona esofagogástrica. Se considera que la prevalencia de pirosis en la población general es superior al 30 %. El tiempo de exposición ácida supone el patrón oro para el diagnóstico y se entiende como positivo si supera el 6 % del tiempo total del estudio en mediciones prolongadas. Aunque los inhibidores de la bomba de protones continúan siendo el tratamiento de elección, estudios con los bloqueadores ácidos competitivos de potasio han arrojado resultados esperanzadores, ya que han demostrado gran eficacia en la supresión de la secreción ácida del estómago.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePanorama actual del medicamentoSame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207