MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415699472 · doi:10.32920/30483512.v1

Smart post-stroke virtual assessment using AI-driven analytics

2025· article· W4415699472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationPopulationStroke (engine)Wearable computerActivities of daily livingScope (computer science)Scalability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the World Bank report, 15% of the world population suffers from a disability such as a stroke, myopathy, neuropathy, spinal cord injuries, bone atrophy, etc. Stroke annually occurs for 15 million people worldwide, and 50,000 are in Canada. For stroke survivors, assessment rehabilitation is often required to assist the affected body parts in regaining control over their mobility. With a substantial portion of the global population experiencing disabilities, including stroke survivors, remote patient monitoring and assessment using sensor technology and IoT devices has become feasible. Identifying and assessing the impaired body part is essential to providing proper treatment and rehabilitation plans. Therefore, monitoring Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and complex body movements of post-stroke survivors could deliver a wealth of clinically applicable information. Specifically, evaluating stroke ADLs in a clinical setting is constrained to information provided by a healthcare professional and subjective rating scales based on their judgment. Thus, the assessment score and tests for stroke patients are done manually with a physiotherapist's opinion, which is subjective. To address the above-mentioned challenges for stroke survivors and utilize artificial intelligence (AI) in the rehabilitation assessment area, this thesis investigated the problem of iii automatically identifying affected body parts and the severity level of the affected hand. Furthermore, incorporating diverse sensor technologies, encompassing open-source wearable sensor-based (Xsens) and camera-based (Vicon) datasets, enriches the scope and depth of this thesis. Additionally, addressing the scalability of the developed AI model and maintaining the privacy of the patients' dataset is investigated. A novel Multi-Level Meta Learner (MLML) diagnosis model was developed using ensemble learning to accurately classify stroke patients' affected hands from non-affected hands virtually. Moreover, provides an intelligent post stroke severity assessment using a consensus clustering algorithm called Post-Stroke Assessment-Midified Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (PSA-MNMF) inspired by the advances in consensus learning that combine various clustering methods into one united clustering to produce more stable and robust results than individual clustering. The method is the first to investigate the severity levels using unsupervised learning and trunk displacement features in the frequency domain for post-stroke smart assessment. To ensure scalability and patient privacy, a federated learning approach called the Post-Stroke Federated Learning Consensus-Driven Model (PSA-FL-CDM) was proposed to harness the vast datasets, enhance the model's performance, and reduce computational time compared to the centralized model. From a clinical standpoint, there is an increasing recognition of the shift from traditional clinical assessments to a more technologically advanced approach. This shift involves utilizing AI-powered sensors to comprehensively assess neurological deficits, functional capabilities, and activities of daily living and even potentially estimate the quality of life. The primary objective of this thesis was to satisfy the needs of clinically assessing post-stroke, assess and compare the functional capabilities of the affected hand in post-stroke patients and a control group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→