MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415702056 · doi:10.1145/3774327

HiSpMM: High Performance High Bandwidth Sparse-Dense Matrix Multiplication on HBM-equipped FPGAs

2025· article· en· W4415702056 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Sedigh Baroughi, Manoj B. Rajashekar, Akhil Raj Baranwal, Zhenman Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityBottleneckField-programmable gate arrayWorkloadSpeedupMatrix multiplicationDesign space explorationBandwidth (computing)Robustness (evolution)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse Matrix-Dense Matrix Multiplication (SpMM) is a critical operation in scientific computing, machine learning, and graph analytics. However, accelerating SpMM on FPGAs presents major challenges due to irregular memory access patterns and imbalanced workload distribution. In this work, we address a fundamental bottleneck in SpMM acceleration on High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)-equipped FPGAs: workload imbalance among processing elements (PEs). Additionally, we mitigate a scalability barrier present in state-of-the-art designs—namely, the tight coupling between PEs and HBM channels for dense matrix access. Furthermore, we provide an automated design space exploration framework. We propose HiSpMM, a high-performance SpMM accelerator architecture that introduces Dense Row Sharing to mitigate PE under-utilization by distributing heavy-row computations, a decoupled HBM access mechanism to allow independent scaling of PEs and memory bandwidth, and an automation tool that optimizes design parameters according to matrix structure-specific properties and user-defined hardware constraints. Our design achieves a geomean of \(5.81\times\) speedup and \(5.75\times\) energy efficiency improvement for imbalanced matrices compared to state-of-the-art designs, while also maintaining competitive performance for balanced matrices on the AMD/Xilinx U280 HBM FPGA board. Our HiSpMM project will be open sourced in the near future at https://github.com/SFU-HiAccel/HiSpMM .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and SystemsSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207