Memahami, Menyuarakan, dan Mengatasi Permasalahan Perempuan dalam Ruang Terbatas pada Masa Orde Baru Sebelum Reformasi 1998
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explains the experience of voicing women’s injustices in Indonesia during the New Order before the 1998 Reformation. It begins with the chronology of the author’s encounter on women’s issues and feminist perspective. These efforts were challenged by the State during the New Order. The State challenged those in several forms, such as interrogation, terror, and threats. This article analyzes women’s struggles using the concept of patriarchy from Walby and the politics of differentiation from Young. It also explains why the failure to fulfill one form of injustice for women, namely reproductive rights in the family planning program in Indonesia, became a point of contention between women’s issue activists and the State. Even though they faced challenges from the State, as long as the sense of injustice is still real, efforts to overcome the problem will continue to be carried out by women activists
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".