SELIC: Semantic-Enhanced Learned Image Compression via High-Level Textual Guidance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Learned image compression (LIC) techniques have achieved remarkable progress; however, effectively integrating high-level semantic information remains challenging. In this work, we present a Semantic-Enhanced Learned Image Compression framework, termed SELIC, which leverages high-level textual guidance to improve rate-distortion performance. Specifically, SELIC employs a text encoder to extract rich semantic descriptions from the input image. These textual features are transformed into fixed-dimension tensors and seamlessly fused with the image-derived latent representation. By embedding the SELIC tensor directly into the compression pipeline, our approach enriches the bitstream without requiring additional inputs at the decoder, thereby maintaining fast and efficient decoding. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets (e.g., Kodak) demonstrate that integrating semantic information substantially enhances compression quality. Our SELIC-guided method outperforms a baseline LIC model without semantic integration by approximately 0.1-0.15 dB across a wide range of bit rates in PSNR and achieves a 4.9% BD-rate improvement over VVC. Moreover, this improvement comes with minimal computational overhead, making the proposed SELIC framework a practical solution for advanced image compression applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".