Spatiotemporal profiling of functional network overlapping modules in Alzheimer’s disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive neural network degradation. In brain functional networks, overlapping module structures provide more accurate representations of brain function than nonoverlapping structures. Since the involvement of overlapping nodes in multiple modules can vary over time, investigating dynamic functional changes in the brain may provide deeper insights into the structural characteristics of these overlapping modules. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of overlapping modular brain organization remain unclear. We employed resting-state fMRI to explore the overlapping modular organization and dynamic multilayer modules in 64 AD (Agemean = 74.04) and 61 healthy controls (HC, Agemean = 74.86) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Compared with HC, AD exhibited increased overlapping modules and decreased modularity, with altered nodal overlapping probability, particularly in the superior frontal cortex and hippocampus. Higher nodal overlapping probability correlated with greater flexibility and was associated with larger amyloid deposits. Lasso regression analysis further revealed strong correlations between overlapping nodal characteristics and cognitive performance. Our findings suggest that overlapping nodes are critical components in AD, demonstrating high amyloid deposition, significant functional flexibility, and strong associations to cognitive behavior. These alterations may enhance the understanding of AD pathology and contribute to the development of biomarkers for improved diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it