MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415714424 · doi:10.51344/agjslsv4i14

The Criminal Confrontation of the Phenomenon of Marital Rape between Legislation and Judicial Practice in the Moroccan Penal Law: A Comparative Study

2025· article· W4415714424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Youssef Lachgar

Bibliographic record

VenueArab German journal of Sharia & law sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislatorDignityLegislationLegislatureCriminal codePhenomenonCriminal lawDomestic violenceSexual violence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research addresses the issue of marital rape, one of the most sensitive topics that has sparked wide legal, social, and jurisprudential debate in Morocco due to its close connection with human rights and women’s dignity within the institution of marriage. The study adopted a comparative analytical approach, analyzing national and international legal texts, reviewing Moroccan and comparative judicial precedents, and assessing their adequacy in protecting women from sexual coercion within marriage. The findings revealed that the Moroccan Penal Code does not explicitly criminalize marital rape, and this ambiguity has led to divergent judicial interpretations—some excluding the possibility of such a crime within marriage, viewing marital relations as granting the right to intercourse, while others consider it a crime whenever consent is absent, based on constitutional principles and international conventions that guarantee women’s physical and psychological integrity. The research also demonstrated that the Law on Combating Violence against Women (2018) did not explicitly address this issue, thereby maintaining the existing legislative gap. In contrast, several comparative legal systems, such as French and Canadian law, have taken a clear stance by criminalizing marital rape. It becomes evident that the Moroccan legislator has refrained from regulating marital rape due to the difficulty of codifying and criminalizing this phenomenon with precise legal provisions, as it may be perceived as a potential threat to the stability of Moroccan family life. Consequently, the study recommends amending the Penal Code to clarify the legal position on the matter, enhancing judicial training in handling domestic violence cases, raising public awareness about the concept of consent and mutual respect in marital relations, and providing psychological and legal support for victims.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab German journal of Sharia & law sciencesSame topicSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesFrench-language works237,207