The Criminal Confrontation of the Phenomenon of Marital Rape between Legislation and Judicial Practice in the Moroccan Penal Law: A Comparative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research addresses the issue of marital rape, one of the most sensitive topics that has sparked wide legal, social, and jurisprudential debate in Morocco due to its close connection with human rights and women’s dignity within the institution of marriage. The study adopted a comparative analytical approach, analyzing national and international legal texts, reviewing Moroccan and comparative judicial precedents, and assessing their adequacy in protecting women from sexual coercion within marriage. The findings revealed that the Moroccan Penal Code does not explicitly criminalize marital rape, and this ambiguity has led to divergent judicial interpretations—some excluding the possibility of such a crime within marriage, viewing marital relations as granting the right to intercourse, while others consider it a crime whenever consent is absent, based on constitutional principles and international conventions that guarantee women’s physical and psychological integrity. The research also demonstrated that the Law on Combating Violence against Women (2018) did not explicitly address this issue, thereby maintaining the existing legislative gap. In contrast, several comparative legal systems, such as French and Canadian law, have taken a clear stance by criminalizing marital rape. It becomes evident that the Moroccan legislator has refrained from regulating marital rape due to the difficulty of codifying and criminalizing this phenomenon with precise legal provisions, as it may be perceived as a potential threat to the stability of Moroccan family life. Consequently, the study recommends amending the Penal Code to clarify the legal position on the matter, enhancing judicial training in handling domestic violence cases, raising public awareness about the concept of consent and mutual respect in marital relations, and providing psychological and legal support for victims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".