MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415714499 · doi:10.54700/mcj30d61

Архимандрит Мелхиседек (Заболотский): биографический очерк

2025· article· W4415714499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Георгий Дмитриев

Bibliographic record

VenueСретенское слово · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyPeriod (music)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Metropolitan areaMiddle AgesQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archimandrite Melchizedek (Zabolotsky) (1754–1794), one of the closest assistants to Metropolitan Platon (Levshin) of Moscow, held several key church positions in the period from the 1780s to the early 1790s: he was rector of the famous Trinity Seminary and the Slavic-Greco-Latin Academy, vicar of the Trinity-Sergius Lavra and the Vysokopetrovsky monastery in Moscow. However, despite such important posts, no detailed biographical information has been preserved about him, he did not leave a visible trace in history. Examining the archival material of the Trinity Seminary and Academy, the Pereslavl Consistory and the Moscow Synodal Office, it was possible to identify, clarify and supplement important data for compiling the biography of Archimandrite Melchizedek, and, as a consequence, the history of the Moscow Theological Academy and the Trinity-Sergius Monastery. The name of Archimandrite Melchizedek, who was twice nominated to the episcopal see, is closely connected with the personality of Metropolitan Nikanor (Klementyevsky), as well as a number of famous hierarchs of the late eighteenth and first half of the nineteenth centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСретенское словоSame topicHistorical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207