Predicting the response of fixed-ended pipelines to swelling load of expansive soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In lifeline engineering, pipelines are often connected by manholes and traverse expansive soil regions. Expansive soil is known for its unfavorable engineering properties, undergoing volume changes under environmental influences. This study develops a simplified analytical framework, where the manholes are idealized as fixed supports, the pipeline is modeled using Timoshenko beams, the joints are represented by combined shear and rotational spring elements, and the soil–structure interaction is captured through discrete Winkler foundations. The governing equations are solved using the finite difference method. The method demonstrates reliable accuracy when evaluated against the data from large-scale experiments, numerical simulations, and existing theoretical models. Parametric analyses show that under swelling loads, rigid pipelines are most prone to bending failure near the manholes. Flexible pipes effectively reduce the risk of bending-induced failure and improve the structural resilience. Increasing the pipe diameter alters the strain distribution, while changes in manhole spacing have limited influence but can reduce the peak strain in continuous pipelines. Larger fluctuations in moisture content significantly increase the potential of pipe failure. Therefore, controlling moisture variation is crucial in geotechnical design for buried pipelines in expansive soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".