MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415717705 · doi:10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205798

Integrating advanced frequency-domain signal processing with machine learning for accurate leak detection in subsurface CO2 storage

2025· article· en· W4415717705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGas Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersQatar National Research FundQatar Foundation
KeywordsRandom forestLeakBoosting (machine learning)Naive Bayes classifierGradient boostingPipeline (software)Leak detectionSignal processingProbabilistic logicFeature engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ensuring the integrity of geological CO 2 storage is critical for the long-term success of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. The detection and localisation of potential leakage events rapidly and accurately remains a key challenge, particularly under constraints of limited monitoring data. This study presents a proof-of-concept framework that integrates advanced frequency-domain signal processing with machine learning to address this challenge using only pressure data from a monitoring well in a CO 2 storage site. Here, pressure signals are translated into the frequency domain using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) in order to extract physically meaningful features that are highly sensitive to leakage phenomena. These features capture subtle variations in signal behaviour that are often missed in time-domain analysis. A two-stage machine learning pipeline is also developed, involving a classification stage to distinguish leak versus no-leak conditions, followed by leak localisation in a regression stage. The results showed that in the leak detection stage, ensemble and probabilistic classifiers, particularly Naive Bayes (test accuracy = 0.9873, F1 = 0.9788) and Random Forest (test accuracy = 0.9823, F1 = 0.9016), outperformed linear models by a substantial margin. In the localisation stage, the K-Nearest Neighbours Regressor (test R 2 = 0.9899, MAE ≈ 6.8 m) and Gradient Boosting Regressor (test R 2 = 0.9790, MAE ≈ 9.5 m) achieved the highest spatial prediction accuracy. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that frequency-domain feature engineering substantially enhances leak-detection sensitivity and spatial inference accuracy compared to time-domain methods. The proposed framework is computationally efficient, requiring only sparse pressure data, and can be integrated into real-time monitoring systems. • Novel framework integrates frequency-domain signal processing (FFT) with machine learning for CO 2 leak detection. • Achieves accurate leak detection and localisation using only sparse pressure data from a single monitoring well. • Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) extracts features sensitive to leakage phenomena. • A two-stage ML pipeline classifies leaks and estimates their location. • Ensemble models show superior detection and localisation performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it