Electromechanical and Acoustic Characterization of Dual Mode Rectangular PMUT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multifrequency operation in micromachined ultrasonic transducers, enabled by targeted excitation of specific vibrational modes, has emerged as an attractive approach for achieving tunable performance and configurability, well-suited for advanced ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. This paper presents a dual-electrode rectangular piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (PMUT) designed for efficient dual-frequency operation through mode-selective actuation. The proposed architecture employs segmented electrodes that are spatially aligned with the strain distributions of two distinct flexural modes, enabling selective excitation of Mode 1 (fundamental) and Mode 3 (higher order) through appropriate electrode actuation. Finite element simulations and impedance analysis were used to guide the electrode configuration and validate the mode-selective behavior. The dual-mode PMUT was fabricated alongside a conventional single-electrode PMUT using identical membrane dimensions and material stack for direct comparison. Comprehensive electrical and underwater acoustic characterization confirmed that the conventional PMUT is limited to single-frequency operation at the fundamental resonance. In contrast, the proposed design achieved a substantial improvement in higher-order performance, with a threefold increase in acoustic pressure at Mode 3 compared to the conventional device. These results demonstrate that mode-aligned electrode segmentation enables efficient dual-mode operation without added fabrication complexity, making the design highly suitable for multifrequency ultrasonic applications such as biomedical imaging and sensing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".