MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415719582 · doi:10.18280/ts.420513

Retinal Vessel Segmentation and Lesion Detection for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis Using Context-Aware Deep Neural Networks on SPECTRAL OCT Data

2025· article· W4415719582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
In Seop Na, Jemima Jebaseeli Theena, Anandakumar Haldorai

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotionMinistry of Oceans and Fisheries
KeywordsDiabetic retinopathySegmentationRetinalArtificial neural networkLesionImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the primary causes of visual impairment in the world today is Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), which emphasizes the need for prompt and precise diagnosis to stop the progression of the illness.To improve retinal vascular segmentation and lesion identification, this work presents a unique architecture that combines Context Encoding Deep Neural Networks (CEDNN) with 3D-Spectral Optical Coherence Tomography (SPECTRAL OCT) imaging.The SPECTRAL OCT scans are subjected to Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) to enhance the image quality and for more accurate feature extraction.The CEDNN model utilizes context-encoding mechanisms to accurately segment retinal vessels by capturing both global and localized features.For lesion detection, specialized feature-encoding layers amplify subtle pathological signals while preserving structural details, correctly recognizing exudates, hemorrhages, and microaneurysms as DR indications.The CEDNN architecture enables accurate extraction of structural information for vessel segmentation, while the context-aware layers ensure reliable lesion identification without compromising spatial coherence.The model is validated on clinical 3D SPECTRAL OCT images and publicly available benchmark datasets, achieving outstanding performance with a 95% confidence interval for accuracy between 98.8% and 99.8%.The results show an F1-score of 99.3%, 99.4% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 99.2% precision, and 99.3% accuracy.These results highlight the model's robustness in capturing fine microvascular abnormalities and DR-related lesions across varied imaging conditions.The proposed 3D SPECTRAL OCT-based CEDNN framework offers a scalable, cost-effective solution for large-scale clinical screening and automated DR diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207