MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415720076 · doi:10.18280/ts.420549

A Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Based on ECA-ConvNeXt and BWO-VMD

2025· article· W4415720076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xinchao Li, Di Yuan, Guoxi Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Fault (geology)Fault detection and isolationRoller bearing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to address the challenges of extracting meaningful features and enhancing the noise immunity and robustness of diagnostic models in rolling bearing fault diagnosis, a novel method is proposed.This method combines the variational mode decomposition (VMD) features extraction algorithm with the Beluga Whale Optimization Algorithm (BWO) and utilizes an improved ConvNeXt network featuring an efficient channel attention mechanism (ECA).Firstly, The BWO algorithm optimizes the number of mode decomposition and penalty factors in VMD, seeking the optimal parameter combination based on the highest permutation entropy fitness.It then performs VMD decomposition on the fault signal to extract the most representative sample features.Secondly, the Gram angle field (GAF) encoding method transforms the extracted one-dimensional feature signals into twodimensional features.At the same time, the ECA-Block module is specifically designed to update the Block module in the ConvNeXt network.ECA is introduced into the ConvNeXt network, the two-dimensional feature signal after GAF conversion is input into the ECA-ConvNeXt network fault diagnosis model for training, identification, and classification.Finally, the verification process for the original signal loading noise of the bearing vibration data set from Case Western Reserve University has been conducted.The results indicate that the ECA-ConvNeXt model, trained with BWO-VMD, demonstrates high accuracy in bearing fault diagnosis.The accuracy is 99.78% for identifying the original fault vibration signals, and the classification accuracy after loading different signal-to-noise ratio Gaussian white noise is above 99.57%.Experimental conditions varied across different datasets, including load and noise, in the model transfer experiments.The average recognition rate for load model transfer was 96.22%, while for noise model transfer, it was 98.22%, exceeding that of the comparative algorithm.Additionally, the recognition rate exceeded expectations and bit the least fluctuation.The experiments demonstrate that the proposed method possesses excellent noise resilience and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207