MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415721453 · doi:10.5376/tgmb.2025.15.0024

Prospects for Synthetic Biology and Sustainable Utilization of <i>Torreya grandis</i>

2025· article· W4415721453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baofu Huang, Chuchu Liu, Guangman Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueTree Genetics and Molecular Breeding · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldChemistry
TopicWood and Agarwood Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic biologySustainable developmentTranscriptomeComponent (thermodynamics)Key (lock)Metabolic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study summarized the molecular regulation and synthetic pathways of Torreya grandis in major metabolites such as sterols, amino acids and flavonoids. Through joint analysis of gene cloning, transcriptome and metabolome, it was found that some key genes play important roles in the synthesis and stress resistance of active components, and the regulatory potential of transcription factors in metabolic pathways was explored. The nutrient cycling and utilization of Torreya grandis at different forest ages were reviewed. It was expounded that precise nutrition management is crucial for the long-term stability and sustainable development of the forest stand. Combined with the methods of synthetic biology, the prospects and challenges of Torreya grandis in high-value utilization and the development of eco-friendly industries were proposed. This research aims to provide theoretical and technical support for the molecular breeding, functional component development and sustainable utilization of Torreya grandis .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTree Genetics and Molecular BreedingSame topicWood and Agarwood ResearchFrench-language works237,207