MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415724545 · doi:10.3788/lop250887

复杂交通场景下道路毫米波雷达-相机融合自动标定

2025· article· en· W4415724545 on OpenAlexfundno aff
曹岚 Cao Lan, 顾心远 Gu Xinyuan, 朱海洋 Zhu Haiyang, 袁斌霞 Yuan Binxia, 杨浩宇 Yang Haoyu

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Optoelectronics Progress · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsTelmatologyNatural (archaeology)Metamorphic petrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

针对传统标定方法依赖先验信息导致人工成本高、难以适应动态场景的问题,提出一种基于改进轨迹关联与动态采样的路侧毫米波雷达-相机自动标定方法(ICAT-BANSAC-LM)。首先,构建改进的轨迹感知关联策略(ICAT),通过引入角度距离估计实现无反射标记物的自动数据关联;其次,引入基于动态贝叶斯网络的自适应采样一致性(BANSAC)算法,在前端进行动态加权采样与异常值过滤;最后,采用Huber损失函数改进的Levenberg-Marquardt(LM)算法优化标定结果。实验结果表明,在交通密集、视觉条件差及雨天等复杂场景下,所提算法的重投影误差均方根分别为3.06、4.07、3.67 cm,较随机采样一致性(RANSAC)-LM算法的精度分别提升36.9%、37.6%、37.3%。所提算法显著提升了恶劣环境下的标定精度与鲁棒性,为智能交通系统提供了可靠的技术支持。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser & Optoelectronics ProgressSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207