MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415724960 · doi:10.1002/agt2.70200

Thermally Activated Dual‐Room‐Temperature Phosphorescence: Triplet Up‐Converted Anti‐Kasha in Dendrimers Enabled by Rigid Matrix Stabilization

2025· article· en· W4415724960 on OpenAlexaff
Chensen Li, Bo Xu, Song Zhang, Jacky W. Y. Lam, Zheng Zhao, Ben Zhong Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueAggregate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceScience, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen MunicipalityInnovation and Technology CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhosphorescenceDendrimerPolymerCarbazoleAcceptorCommon emitterMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Room‐temperature phosphorescence (RTP) materials are a significant research field for anti‐counterfeiting, bioimaging, and optoelectronic devices, but anti‐Kasha RTP still lacks clear molecular design strategies, and conventional rigid polymer matrices fail to break Kasha's rule. To address these issues, this work proposes an acceptor dendronization strategy to synthesize the dendrimer emitter dTC‐BPSAF. Carbazole dendrons regulate triplet hybridization, enabling dTC‐BPSAF to form near‐degenerate lowest triplet ( T 1 ) and high‐lying triplet ( T 2 ) states with hybrid local‐charge transfer (HLCT) character and large spin‐orbit coupling. Integrating dTC‐BPSAF into rigid polymers further stabilizes T 2 by suppressing non‐radiative decay. Temperature‐dependent time‐resolved phosphorescence spectra and transient absorption spectra confirm that rigid matrix‐based films exhibit thermally activated endothermic T 1 → T 2 up‐conversion and dual‐band anti‐Kasha RTP. In contrast, a moderately rigid polymer matrix shows weak T 2 emission, while a soft polymer matrix only produces T 1 emission. This study establishes a dendrimer‐matrix synergy strategy combining molecular‐level triplet engineering, providing a generalizable approach for efficient anti‐Kasha RTP materials and new avenues for advanced photonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAggregateSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207