MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415729868 · doi:10.1002/ppj2.70046

Leaf hyperspectral reflectance detects pre‐visual stress to <i>Fusarium</i> wilt in strawberries

2025· article· en· W4415729868 on OpenAlexaff
Jessie L.‐S. Au, Christopher Y. S. Wong, Dominique D. A. Pincot, Frank N. Martin, Rishav Ray, J. Mason Earles, Troy S. Magney

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Phenome Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceNational Institute of Food and Agriculture
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingMultispectral imagePhotochemical Reflectance IndexReflectivityPrincipal component analysisCultivarStomatal conductanceChlorophyllCanopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum , threatens global food security and high‐value crops like strawberries ( Fragaria × ananassa ) in California. Traditional detection, reliant on visual symptoms, often comes too late for intervention. This study uses leaf‐level hyperspectral reflectance to detect physiological changes in resistant and susceptible strawberry cultivars. Weekly measurements of leaf reflectance, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll fluorescence were collected across 14 cultivars inoculated with the pathogen. We examined both common spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) and patterns across the full hyperspectral range. In addition to SVIs, we assessed the full reflectance space (400–2515 nm) using principal coordinates analysis on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and calculated coefficient of variation to evaluate spectral sensitivity to disease progression. Susceptible plants showed spectral shifts 3–5 weeks before visible symptoms. The normalized phaeophytinization index was most sensitive, indicating early chlorophyll degradation, while normalized difference vegetation index and photochemical reflectance index captured structural and physiological changes prior to visible infection. Spectral indices outperformed physiological traits, with stronger responses in stomatal conductance and leaf temperature than fluorescence. Hyperspectral disease associations highlight predictive power concentrated in the red and near‐infrared range, highlighting the potential of multispectral tools for field applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant Phenome JournalSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207