MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QUO REVERA IMUS? DALŠÍ ROZVOJ NČLP V ČASE TURBULENCÍ A JEHO MAPOVÁNÍ NA ZNÁMÉ KÓDOVACÍ SYSTÉMY

2025· article· W4415731481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petra Lavríková

Bibliographic record

VenueMedsoft · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Status quoCoding (social sciences)Data collectionQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For more than a quarter of a century, domestic clinical laboratories have had access to the DASTA communication data standard, which uses the National Code List of Laboratory Items (NČLP) for an unambiguous identification of laboratory orders and results. Discussed are the circumstances surrounding the creation of the NČLP, its brief history, its structure, and above all, a comparison with other international coding systems. At the same time, the discussion includes the recurring question of why the choice was NČLP and not, for example, LOINC, NPU, or SNOMED. It is noted that the NČLP is not only a part of DASTA, but will also be an integral part of the newly prepared HL7 FHIR standard, that it is currently being revised and implemented, and that the conditions are being created for the completion of mapping to NPU and the preparation of mapping to LOINC. NČLP is being developed in accordance with the needs of all fields of laboratory medicine involved and also covers a number of special areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedsoftSame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207