MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415734554 · doi:10.2196/76278

Age Differences in Flow Experience During Body Movement–Controlled Video Game Rehabilitation Tasks: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4415734554 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Serious Games · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFlow Experience in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationCognitionControl (management)Motor controlFlow (mathematics)Sense of controlPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Body movement-controlled video games (BMCVGs) are increasingly adopted in rehabilitation because they combine physical training with interactive engagement. Flow experience, a critical factor for enhancing user engagement and training efficacy, exhibits age-related differences that are essential for designing age-appropriate rehabilitation tasks. However, current BMCVG rehabilitation tasks often overlook these age-related differences in subjective experience, leading to insufficient engagement among older adults. Objective: This study aimed to explore differences in flow experience between younger and older adults when performing the same BMCVG rehabilitation task and to provide empirical evidence for designing personalized and age-appropriate programs. Methods: A total of 40 participants were recruited, including 21 older adults (mean age 63.00, SD 6.64 y; n=10, 48% male participants) and 19 younger adults (mean age 24.68, SD 1.16 y; n=9, 47% male participants). Participants performed the "Space Pop" task in Kinect Adventures, simulating limb coordination training. Flow experience was assessed using the Chinese version of the Flow State Scale-2, which measures 9 dimensions of flow. Group differences were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and effect sizes (Cohen d) were calculated via bootstrap estimation. Results: Older adults exhibited significantly lower overall flow experience than younger adults (W=339.5; P<.001; Cohen d=1.45; η2=0.37). Significant differences were also found in the dimensions of "challenge-skill balance" (W=339; P<.001); "clear goals" (W=271; P=.04); "sense of control" (W=389.5; P<.001); and "loss of self-consciousness" (W=268; P=.048). The largest effect was observed in the "sense of control" dimension (Cohen d=3.22; η2=0.74), indicating it was the most significantly impacted by age. Other dimensions (eg, concentration and time transformation) showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Age plays a significant role in shaping flow experiences during BMCVG rehabilitation tasks. Older adults' reduced flow may be attributed to declines in cognitive processing speed, motor control, and self-efficacy, which particularly impair their sense of control and goal clarity. Tailoring designs through strategies such as dynamic difficulty adjustment, clearer goal cues, and reduced motor demands is crucial. These adaptations can enhance older adults' sense of control and immersion, promoting active participation and ultimately improving rehabilitation outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it