MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415734603 · doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfaf085

Sexual activities, erectile dysfunction, and the use of sexual management strategies among assigned males with genital ablation interests

2025· article· en· W4415734603 on OpenAlex
Erik Wibowo, Thomas W. Johnson, Richard J. Wassersug, James R. Agapoff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex organAblationSexually activeErectile dysfunctionIncidence (geometry)Sexual behavior

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Assigned males with genital ablation interests may be at higher risk of having erectile dysfunction (ED), especially those who have gone through androgen suppressing pharmacological therapies, orchiectomy and/or penectomy. Aim: To determine the prevalence and severity of ED in assigned males with castration interests, the types of management strategies they use and what factors are associated with using these strategies. Methods: We launched an online survey on the Eunuch Archive website to better understand how common ED is, as well as sexual frequencies, and the use of sexual management strategies among assigned males with genital ablation interests. Outcomes: ED and sexual activity frequencies, preferred role in sexual activities, and previous use of sexual management strategies. Results: Data from 363 assigned male individuals (50.7 ± 15.6 years old; 23.6% and 3.7% had been orchiectomized and penectomized respectively) showed that 11.2% reported having ED 25-50% of the time, 12.8% had ED 50-75% of the time, and 22.9% had ED 75-100% of the time. Yet a large proportion remained sexually active. For example, 63.5%, 56.2% and 8.8% reported watching porn, masturbating, and having partnered sex several times a week respectively. During partnered sex, 13% of the participants preferred to be in the insertive role, whereas nearly 40% preferred to be in the receptive role. A quarter preferred non-penetrative sex. To maintain sexual activities, commonly used strategies included oral medication (38.8%), vacuum erection devices (25.6%), and strap-on dildo (17.5%). Penile sleeve, penile injection and penile support device were rarely used (<10%). Clinical Implications: Data from our study can be used by clinicians to advise their clients, for example individuals with genital ablation interest who seek to maintain their sexual activities. Strengths & Limitations: Participants completed validated questionnaires. Data were collected online and could not be independently verified. Conclusions: A strong interest in genital ablation is often associated with a desire to be less sexual. Consistent with that is a high incidence of ED in this population. However, many men with exceptional interests in genital ablation nevertheless remain sexually active and use various strategies to maintain penetrative sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it