MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415741286 · doi:10.1111/sapm.70134

On the Evolution of Relativistic Dust in Schwarzschild–de Sitter and Schwarzschild–Anti‐de Sitter Spacetimes. Part I: The Vanishing Mass Case

2025· article· en· W4415741286 on OpenAlex
Yifan Liu, Xianshu Qu, Yu‐Zhu Wang, Changhua Wei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersZhejiang Provincial Outstanding Youth Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDe Sitter universeAnti-de Sitter spacede Sitter–Schwarzschild metricBlack hole (networking)Cauchy distributionde Sitter invariant special relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Given that relativistic density and velocity propagate at the same speed, the Cauchy problem with smooth and compactly supported initial data for relativistic dust in Schwarzschild–de Sitter (SdS) and Schwarzschild–anti‐de Sitter (SAdS) spacetimes without black hole has been investigated using the characteristic method. Based on the explicit solution formulas under the spherically symmetric assumption, a precise classification of the initial data is provided, elucidating whether the classical solution for relativistic dust will persist globally or encounter a finite‐time blowup. Moreover, the paper offers a further analysis of the exact blowup phenomenon, including detailed insights into the blowup rate related to the blowup time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it