A Longitudinal Study on School Principals’ Autonomy as Street-Level Managers During Unprecedented Educational Reform
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines how principals’ exercise of individual autonomy and discretion shapes their roles as street-level managers, bridging the gap between strategic goals and operational demands in precarious institutional contexts. The paper contributes to an emerging area of research and offers valuable empirical evidence. Research Methods: A longitudinal qualitative design involved semi-structured interviews with 14 purposively sampled school principals over three years. Grounded theory principles guided data analysis, employing synchronic and diachronic approaches with open and axial coding. Triangulation and comparative category analysis were conducted iteratively. Findings: The analysis traces the evolution of principals’ strategies during the implementation of the Chilean New Public Education Law. In response to perceived abandonment by the middle tier, unclear guidelines, and community demands, principals exercised autonomy through three adaptive strategies: Collective Influence to strengthen systemic impact; Territorial Networks to secure essential resources; and Pedagogical Improvement to sustain educational quality despite challenges. These practices illustrate how principals adapted to the improvised reform and transformed institutional contexts. Implications for Research and Practice: This study contributes to the understanding of principals as street-level managers by documenting how their use of individual autonomy evolves to adapt and respond to educational reforms and institutional changes. It highlights the need for longitudinal research to capture how principals’ adaptive strategies influence policy design and implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it