MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415747842 · doi:10.1109/tac.2025.3627268

Input-to-State Stabilization of 1-D Parabolic PDEs Under Output Feedback Control

2025· article· W4415747842 on OpenAlexafffund
Yongchun Bi, Guchuan Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Stability (learning theory)Output feedbackDirichlet distributionController (irrigation)Boundary (topology)Lyapunov functionDirichlet boundary conditionFeedback control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of input-to-state stabilization for a class of parabolic equations with time-varying coefficients, subject to Dirichlet and Robin boundary disturbances. By using time-invariant kernel functions, which can reduce the complexity in control design and implementation, an observer-based output feedback controller is designed via backstepping. By using the generalized Lyapunov method, which can be used to handle Dirichlet boundary terms, the input-to-state stability of the closed-loop system under output feedback control, as well as the state estimation error system, is established in the spatial <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$L^\infty$</tex-math></inline-formula>-norm. Numerical simulations are conducted to confirm the theoretical results and to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207