MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415751930 · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114221

H13 tool steel-copper composite fabricated by laser powder bed fusion and melt infiltration for high thermal conductivity tooling applications

2025· article· en· W4415751930 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoud Osman, Priti Wanjara, Javad Gholipour, Fabrice Bernier, Marjan Molavi‐Zarandi, Mathieu Brochu

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Today Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Research Council CanadaCentre québécois de recherche et de développement de l’aluminiumNational Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMicrostructureMartensiteComposite numberThermal conductivityTemperingAusteniteIndentation hardnessTool steelPowder metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-step fabrication process was successfully developed to produce a tool steel/copper (H13/Cu) interpenetrating phase composite (IPC) intended for improving heat management in mold and die applications. H13 functionally graded lattice structures (FGLS) were first fabricated via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the as-built H13 FGLS revealed a predominantly lath martensite microstructure with 16% retained austenite (RA). The microstructure transformed into a fully tempered martensitic phase through a heat treatment, which involved air quenching at 1020 ºC and tempering at 500 ºC for 2 h (QT500). The subsequent infiltration of the H13 lattice with Cu, followed by the QT500 heat treatment, yielded a H13/Cu IPC with a relative density of 99.8%. The H13/Cu interface analysis indicated complete wettability, minimal α(Fe,Cr) precipitates in the Cu matrix (< 2%), and Cu penetration into H13 struts to a depth of 47 ± 7 μm. The microstructure and microhardness of the H13 after Cu infiltration followed by QT500 remained similar to the QT500 reference sample. The effective thermal conductivity ( k e ) of the composite was highly tailorable by adjusting the H13 lattice density, with measured k e values ranging from 145.2 ± 0.7 Wm -1 K -1 to 34 .1 ± 0.1 Wm -1 K -1 for H13 volume fractions of 40% to 90%, respectively. These measurements aligned well with predictions from the Torquato approximation and finite element modeling, confirming the potential to customize thermal properties for specific tooling applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Today CommunicationsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207