Azimuthal and axial structures in 3D particle-in-cell simulation of Penning discharge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report the results of a 3D particle-in-cell simulation of cylindrical Penning discharge with the axial magnetic field in the so-called reflex configuration, where the cathode and anti-cathode are biased to the same negative potential. The discharge is supported by thermal electron emission from the cathode. Electron and ion collisions, including ionization, are fully accounted for. The emphasis is on a specific regime in which the plasma potential at the center of the discharge is positive with respect to the chamber walls, serving as an anode. Spatial and temporal scales of the observed azimuthal and axial fluctuations and structures are characterized. It is suggested that azimuthal structures are caused by the dissipative gradient-drift instability. We find that the axial fluctuations related to the plasma-beam instabilities are weakly correlated with the azimuthal perturbations of the density, so that the azimuthal modes rotate as a whole and do not show any axial shear. The behavior of the electric potential is more involved, demonstrating intermittent standing wave and propagating structures in the axial direction that modulate the electron transport, producing the standing wave pattern (along the z -direction) in the radial electron flux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".