MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415754307 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100649

Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Reward Processing, Interleukin 1β, Striatal Connectivity, and Antidepressant Outcomes in Individuals With Major Depressive Disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 Report

2025· article· en· W4415754307 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stefanie Hassel, Jane A. Foster, Gustavo Turecki, Nicholas A. Bock, Nathan Churchill, Daniel J. Müller, Raymond W. Lam, Valerie H. Taylor, Roumen Milev, Cláudio N. Soares, Susan Rotzinger, Sakina J. Rizvi, Sidney H. Kennedy, Benício N. Frey, Katharine Dunlop

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Global Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoCentre for Global Health ResearchOccupational Cancer Research Centre
FundersOntario Brain Institute
KeywordsAntidepressantPsychopathologySocioeconomic statusMajor depressive disorderDepression (economics)Intervention (counseling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common condition with heterogeneous risk factors. Socioeconomic status (SES) is one such risk factor, which is negatively linked to MDD treatment outcomes and symptom severity. SES is associated with altered resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in reward-processing circuitry and elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels in individuals without depression. However, how the negative consequences of low SES exacerbate MDD psychopathology is poorly understood. Methods: Data on SES (household income and education), depression severity, self-reported reward processing, serum proinflammatory cytokine levels, and neuroimaging for 323 adult participants (211 patients with MDD receiving open-label escitalopram, 112 control participants without depression; 63.4% female) were obtained from the CAN-BIND-1 (Canadian Biomarker Integration in Depression Study-1) dataset. General linear models assessed the effects of MDD diagnosis and SES on self-reported reward processing and proinflammatory cytokine levels. Whole-brain seed-to-voxel RSFC analyses were performed for the dorsal and ventral striatum leveraging 249 participants (150 patients with MDD, 99 control participants; 62.2% female). We also assessed the impact of SES on response to open-label escitalopram. Results: > 2.3 threshold, MDD household income correlated with striatal RSFC with the dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices. Conclusions: Our results elucidate the role of SES and its negative consequences in altering reward processing and antidepressant treatment efficacy in MDD, corroborating previous literature suggesting that SES significantly impacts health outcomes. Better characterizing the relationship between SES and MDD psychopathology may inform future treatment approaches and intervention development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Psychiatry Global Open ScienceSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207