Peran aktif dosen dalam mendorong inovasi dan IPTEK di Kabupaten Pringsewu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kompetisi Karya Inovasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (IPTEK) di Kabupaten Pringsewu bertujuan untuk mendokumentasikan, menganalisis, dan meningkatkan peran dosen dalam pengembangan IPTEK berbasis potensi lokal. Melalui metode workshop, pelatihan, dan sosialisasi, kegiatan ini melibatkan kolaborasi antara dosen, pemerintah daerah, industri, dan masyarakat. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat terhadap inovasi, pengembangan solusi konkret di sektor pertanian, perikanan, dan teknologi informasi, serta terbentuknya ekosistem kolaborasi berkelanjutan. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa sinergi antara perguruan tinggi, pemerintah daerah, dan sektor industri mampu mendukung pembangunan berbasis IPTEK. Rekomendasi mencakup replikasi program di daerah lain, penguatan kemitraan, digitalisasi hasil kompetisi, serta pemberian insentif implementasi inovasi untuk memperluas dampak program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".