MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415755457 · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114878

Antenatal Prediction of Early Cord Clamping among Infants Born Extremely Preterm

2025· article· en· W4415755457 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anup Katheria, Rebecca A. Dorner, William A. Grobman, Matthew A. Rysavy, Jenny Koo, Myra H. Wyckoff, Grecio J. Sandoval, Sara B. DeMauro, Abhik Das, Henry Lee, Michael Cotten, Laura Diaz Calvo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia UniversityResearch Institute, Nationwide Children's HospitalUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of California, Los AngelesNational Institutes of HealthChildren's Hospital of MichiganCanada Research Coordinating CommitteeUniversity at BuffaloUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityChildren's Healthcare of AtlantaChildren's Mercy HospitalEast Carolina UniversityUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonSouthwest HospitalRTI InternationalUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNational Center for Research ResourcesIndiana University HealthUniversity of KansasBrown UniversityCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterSchool of Medicine, Duke UniversityUniversity of MissouriU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesOhio State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNationwide Children's HospitalIndiana UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiMcGovern Medical SchoolColumbia UniversityHealth Sciences Center, University of New MexicoMedical Center, University of RochesterCase Western Reserve UniversityEmory University
KeywordsGestational ageCord clampingEthnic groupPregnancyPreterm labourSmall for gestational ageGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PediatricsSame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207