MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415756489 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101340

Sex and gender differences in the associations between psychosocial stressors at work and coronary heart disease incidence: An 18-year longitudinal study of 5192 Canadian workers

2025· article· en· W4415756489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Work & HealthPublic Health OntarioUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à RimouskiCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of Toronto
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité du Québec à RimouskiCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsPsychosocialLongitudinal studyStressorCoronary heart diseaseProspective cohort studyWork (physics)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Psychosocial stressors at work (PSW) are modifiable occupational stressors associated with an increased coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence. While systematic reviews suggest differences between women and men, there has been limited examinations of potential effect modifiers. This study aimed to explore the effect modifications of characteristics related to sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) in the associations between PSW and CHD incidence over an 18-year follow-up. Methods: This study relied on a prospective cohort of 5192 white-collar workers (50 % women) from 19 public and semi-public enterprises in Quebec, Canada. PSW, defined according to the job strain and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) models, were assessed using self-administered, validated questionnaires. Incident CHD cases were identified from medico-administrative databases using validated algorithms. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between PSW and CHD incidence, stratified by sex, and characteristics related to sex (age) and gender (education level, occupational position, and children load). Results: Associations between PSW and CHD incidence differed by sex. In men, being exposed to both job strain and ERI was associated with a 2-fold increased CHD risk (HR: 2.01, 95 % CI: 1.52-2.65), rising to a 2.80-fold risk among those aged 60 and older (HR: 2.80, 95 % CI: 1.90-4.13). Amplified associations were also observed in men with lower education (HR: 3.23, 95 % CI: 1.73-6.03) and a low children load (HR: 2.48, 95 % CI: 1.74-3.54). In women, the association between ERI and CHD was stronger, although it remained marginally non-significant, among those under 60 years-old (HR: 1.57, 95 % CI: 0.96-2.57), with a lower education level (HR: 1.84, 95 % CI: 0.95-3.56) and with an intermediate to high children load (HR: 1.72, 95 % CI: 0.96-3.10). Conclusions: This study reinforces the importance of considering sex- and gender-related characteristics - such as age, education, and caregiving responsibilities - when examining the associations between PSW and CHD incidence. However, the findings observed among women require replication in larger prospective cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it