MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance evaluation of thermally sprayed Zr-added high entropy alloy coatings

2025· article· en· W4415756581 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Aatif Qazi, Akash Vyas, Pankaj Kumar, Maria Ophelia Jarligo, Jing Liu, André McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Coatings Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCoatingCorrosionScanning electron microscopeLamellar structureIndentation hardnessAlloyOxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the development of multifunctional high-entropy alloy (HEA) coatings by adding Zirconium (Zr) at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15 wt% into an equiatomic AlCoCrFeMo system. Aimed at enhancing resistance to erosion and corrosion for applications in aviation, oil and gas, and potential hydrogen storage environments, four coating compositions, namely Base-HEA (0 wt% Zr), HEA 5Zr, HEA 10Zr, and HEA 15Zr, were fabricated via the flame-spraying process. Comprehensive characterization was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), microhardness testing, adhesion strength evaluation, solid particle erosion at 30° and 90° impingement angles, and corrosion testing in 3.5 % NaCl solution. XRD revealed the presence of BCC solid solution phases, intermetallics, spinel oxides, and ZrO 2 oxides. SEM micrographs showed both thin and thick lamellar splats in the Zr-added coatings. Hardness increased by 30–50 % with Zr addition, with HEA-15Zr showing the highest value. Adhesion strength improved by 12 % in HEA 15Zr, but decreased by 33 % and 15 % in HEA-5Zr and HEA 10Zr, respectively. Erosion testing indicated that HEA-10Zr exhibited 24 % and 21 % improved erosion resistance at 30° and 90°, respectively, due to a favorable hardness–toughness balance. Corrosion resistance measured in saline water at room temperature was also enhanced by 14 % and 88 % for HEA-10Zr and HEA-15Zr coatings as compared to the Base-HEA coating, due to Zr addition. This might be attributed to the formation of passive protective ZrO 2 and Al 2 O 3 oxide films. Among all the compositions, the HEA-10Zr coating demonstrated the optimal combination of hardness, adhesion, erosion resistance, and corrosion protection, making it a strong candidate for use in demanding erosion- and corrosion-prone service environments. • Multifunctional Zr-added AlCoCrFeMo HEA coatings at 5, 10, and 15 wt% were developed using flame spraying, including Base-HEA (0 wt% Zr), HEA 5Zr, HEA 10Zr, and HEA 15Zr. • Zr-added AlCoCrFeMo HEA coatings exhibited an increase in hardness by 30 % to 50 % compared to the Base-HEA coating. • Adhesion strength of the HEA-15Zr coating improved by 12 % compared to the Base-HEA coating. • Erosion testing showed that HEA-10Zr had 24 % and 21 % lower mass loss at 30° and 90° erosion impact angles, respectively, compared to the Base-HEA coating. • Zr-added AlCoCrFeMo HEA coatings exhibited reduced corrosion rates by 14 % and 88 % for HEA-10Zr and HEA-15Zr coatings compared to the Base-HEA coating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSurface and Coatings TechnologySame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207