The Role of Psychologists in Highlighting the Importance of School Ergonomics on the Educational Process from the Perspective of School Teachers in Jordanian Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the role played by psychologists in highlighting the importance of school ergonomics to the educational process, from the perspective of school teachers in Jordanian society, to achieve the study’s objective, the researchers used the descriptive analytical approach to suit this study, where a questionnaire was distributed to a sample of teachers amounting to (88) male and female teachers in Irbid Governorate in Jordan. The questionnaire included three fields, which are (equipment and public facilities, school activities, guidance and mental health) at a rate of (27) paragraphs for each, The study results concluded that the psychologist plays a significant role in highlighting the importance of school ergonomics and its components in the educational process and academic achievement, this was evident in all fields, with public facilities and equipment ranking first, the researcher recommends that school administration and relevant authorities, particularly the Ministry of Education, develop school ergonomics to keep pace with the modern era, the spread of digital technology, and its importance to the educational process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".