MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415758593 · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107041

Early detection of physical fatigue in industry using wearable sensors and contextual modeling

2025· article· en· W4415758593 on OpenAlex
Carlos Albarrán Morillo, Huxiao Shi, John F. Suárez-Pérez, Micaela Demichela

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSafety Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsCanadian Institute of Steel Construction
KeywordsWearable computerSmartwatchBiometricsContext (archaeology)NoveltyPoison controlFuzzy logicActivity recognitionNovelty detection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Nonintrusive physical fatigue detection: smartwatch + context; fuzzy labels; F1 up to 0.9375. • Signals: EDA, pulse, skin temperature, and motion via smartwatch. • Adding demographic and occupational data improves performance. • Context features cut safety–critical false negatives in fatigue states. • Early detection in real plants; scalable, Industry 5.0–aligned safety. Physical fatigue in repetitive production lines contributes to musculoskeletal disorders and absenteeism. This study investigates a pharmaceutical packaging environment in Colombia with 43 operators (42 female; 19–53 years) performing repetitive inspection and packing. Smartwatches captured pulse rate, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and motion, complemented by demographic (age, experience) and occupational factors (task load, line, shift, timing). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reduced dimensionality, and a fuzzy logic–based labeling method—adapted from prior controlled experiments—generated binary and four-class fatigue labels without mid-shift self-reports. These labeled datasets were used to train multiple machine-learning classifiers. Integrating contextual features with biometrics substantially improved performance: in binary classification, F1 increased from 0.8848 (biometrics only) to 0.9375; in four-level classification, F1 rose from 0.8232 to 0.8793. Motion-related metrics emerged as the most informative predictors. Critically, feature integration improved reliability: accuracy for intermediate states (Higher Non-Fatigue and Higher Fatigue) rose by ∼10 percentage points, while false negatives in the Pure Fatigue class were eliminated—3% of cases previously misclassified as Higher Non-Fatigue were instead correctly mapped within the fatigue spectrum. This shift strengthens the system’s effectiveness for real-time safety interventions. The novelty of this work lies in combining biometric and contextual modeling to reduce false negatives in critical fatigue states, providing a scalable, non-intrusive, and human-centered early-warning system. By aligning with Industry 5.0, this approach demonstrates how wearable and contextual data can jointly support proactive and trustworthy safety interventions while maintaining operational flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it