MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415758804 · doi:10.1111/jola.70030

First Nations women in an Australian boarding school: A sociolinguistic ethnography

2025· article· en· W4415758804 on OpenAlex
Lucía Fraiese

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Linguistic Anthropology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian Indigenous Culture and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Government
KeywordsEthnographyArticulation (sociology)SemioticsIdentity (music)Context (archaeology)The Symbolic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This ethnographic account—the first stage of a variationist sociolinguistic study with First Nations youth in Australia—explores the stylistic practices of First Nations women at a boarding school in Western Australia. It shows how drawing on semiotic signs of racialized bodies, anti‐mainstream practices, and orientations to language use, borders create a joint identity as an act of resistance. In displaying subtle distinctions at different levels of symbolic practice, students signal differentiation and give shape to fluid peer groups, or Constellations of Practice. Yet, ultimately, their stylistic practices point to a shared project: the articulation of Aboriginal identity in a settler‐colonial context and, more specifically, within a white‐led boarding school environment where enduring regimes of whiteness persist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it