MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415759478 · doi:10.1007/s11869-025-01854-w

Chemical characterization and source identification of PM2.5 at Baengnyeongdo Island, South korea: Three-year dynamics (2019–2021)

2025· article· en· W4415759478 on OpenAlex
Adal Farooq, Fawad Ashraf, Seok‐Jun Seo, Jungmin Park, Zaeem Bin Babar, J. H. Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAir Quality Atmosphere & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of Environmental ResearchMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of the Punjab
KeywordsRelative humidityParticulatesAerosolNitrateSpring (device)Carbon fibersSeasonalityAir quality indexTotal organic carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) remains a critical air pollutant with substantial public health risks, particularly in East Asia, where domestic emissions and transboundary transport contribute to elevated concentrations. This study examined the annual and seasonal variations of PM 2.5 and its chemical constituents at Baengnyeongdo Island, South Korea, from 2019 to 2021. The constituents analyzed included carbonaceous components (organic carbon [OC] and elemental carbon [EC]), major inorganic ions (sulfate [SO 4 2− ] and nitrate [NO 3 − ]), crustal elements (e.g., silicon [Si], calcium [Ca], iron [Fe], titanium [Ti]), and various other metallic species. The study also sought to identify potential sources of PM 2.5 , with particular emphasis on transboundary influences. Results showed a significant increase in PM 2.5 levels in 2021 (spring mean: 32.657 µgm −3 ), attributed to the resumption of industrial activities following the COVID-19 lockdowns, specific meteorological conditions, such as higher spring relative humidity (74.91%) and increased aerosol water content (32.16 µgm −3 ), and significant transboundary pollution, particularly from China. Seasonal analysis indicated that OC, EC, NO3-, and crustal elements (Si, Ca, Fe, Ti) were the dominant contributors. For example, OC and EC peaked in spring and winter, which was associated with biomass burning, heating, and industrial emissions, which were enhanced by low winter temperatures. NO 3 − also exhibited significant winter peaks (5.921 µgm −3 in 2021), driven by conditions favoring NH 4 NO 3 formation, while SO 4 2− levels, highest in 2019 (4.357 µgm −3 ), displayed a more moderate trend. Meteorological parameters, including aerosol water content, relative humidity, temperature, and wind patterns, play a major role in PM 2.5 formation, accumulation, and dispersion. Back-trajectory modeling consistently confirmed air mass transport from the heavily industrialized regions of China, Mongolia, and Russia during high-pollution episodes across all seasons. These findings underscore the complex interplay between local emissions, transboundary transport, and meteorological factors, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated international air quality management policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it