MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415759986 · doi:10.55041/ijsrem53352

Interview Assistant -- AI Powered Interview Preparation and Assessment Platform

2025· article· W4415759986 on OpenAlexaff
A. Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalyticsJob interviewNatural languageSentiment analysisCloud computingNatural language understandingLanguage technologyFacial expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: In today’s highly competitive job market, effective interview preparation plays a pivotal role in achieving career success. However, conventional preparation methods often fail to provide personalization, real-time feedback, and comprehensive performance assessment. To address these challenges, this research presents the AI-Driven Interview Assistant — an intelligent, adaptive, and comprehensive AI-powered interview preparation and assessment platform. The proposed system leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP), speech analysis, and computer vision to simulate realistic interview environments while delivering actionable feedback and personalized improvement recommendations. The platform employs Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s GPT and Google’s Gemini for intelligent question generation and response evaluation. Real-time speech-to-text conversion using Google Speech-to-Text API or Whisper AI enables seamless voice interaction, while sentiment analysis with Hugging Face transformers evaluates emotional tone, confidence, and engagement. The core evaluation engine analyzes responses based on content relevance, communication clarity, technical accuracy, and behavioral competence. Optional computer vision modules assess facial expressions and body language for holistic performance insights. From a technical standpoint, the system is built with a React.js frontend and Node.js/Express backend, ensuring a smooth, interactive user experience. WebRTC integration enables live audio-video interview simulations, while MongoDB or PostgreSQL store detailed performance analytics for adaptive learning. The platform also integrates with job portals and company databases to deliver role-specific and industry-oriented interview preparation. Keywords – Artificial Intelligence (AI), Interview Preparation, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLMs), Speech Recognition, Whisper AI, Sentiment Analysis, Hugging Face Transformers, Computer Vision, Adaptive Learning, Real-time Feedback, Emotion Detection, React.js, Node.js, WebRTC, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Interview Simulation, Candidate Assessment, Skill Enhancement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTSame topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207