MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415762080 · doi:10.1002/cjce.70036

Preparing high‐purity calcium carbonate and potassium sulphate at a low cost using industrial by‐product gypsum

2025· article· en· W4415762080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinliang Tao, Zhenzhen Wang, Aqiang Chen, Hang Xiao, Haidong Zhang, Qingshan Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGypsumRaw materialLeaching (pedology)Potassium carbonateIndustrial wasteCalcium carbonateAmmonium acetateEnvironmentally friendly

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The substantial annual production and low utilization of industrial by‐product gypsum (IBPG) have led to significant ecological, environmental, and safety challenges. To address these issues, a cost‐effective and environmentally friendly approach to convert IBPG and CO 2 ‐sourced raw material into high‐value products, that is, 100% high‐purity of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), ammonium chloride (NH 4 Cl), and potassium sulphate (K 2 SO 4 ), is proposed under ambient conditions by using a developed two‐step method. By employing a recyclable phase transfer catalyst of ammonium acetate and a mixed solution containing saturated terminal products as a simulated mother liquor, efficient leaching of low‐solubility IBPG, impurity separation, and enhanced reaction rates are simultaneously achieved. Some crucial conditions for preparing high‐value target products are optimized, and many traditional by‐products (e.g., syngenite, koktaite, calcium acetate hydrate, K 2 SO 4 · (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , and KCl · NH 4 Cl) are successfully suppressed. The favourable recirculation of the mother liquor demonstrated the prominent advantage in production cost reduction and environmental protection, confirming its industrial feasibility. Therefore, a promising, low‐cost, and sustainable solution for IBPG's resource utilization to prepare high‐value products is put forward here, providing some significant theoretical and industrial guidelines for solid waste disposal and carbon fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207