MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415762440 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116444

Scaling green hydrogen: Production, storage, techno-economics and global perspectives

2025· article· en· W4415762440 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H.B. Aditiya, T.M.I. Mahlia, Zhongyan Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilEuropean CommissionInter-American Development Bank
KeywordsRenewable energySustainabilityHydrogen productionGreenhouse gasInvestment (military)Carbon capture and storage (timeline)Hydrogen technologiesHydrogen economySustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen has emerged as a key green energy carrier for deep decarbonisation, offering a viable pathway to reduce emissions from carbon-intensive industries while enabling greater integration of renewable energy source into the global energy system. This study provides a comprehensive review of green hydrogen production technologies, storage methods, and industrial applications, alongside the financial and regulatory landscape shaping its large-scale deployment. From techno-economic viewpoints, alkaline electrolysis offers cost advantages at approximately USD 270/kW compared with proton membrane exchange and solid oxide electrolysis. Storage technologies show levelised costs of USD 2.48–15.61/kg H 2 with scalability to gigawatt level, surpassing battery systems. Hydrogen adoption enables substantial decarbonisation in hard-to-abate sectors, with deployments estimated to cut more than 1 Mtonne CO 2 emissions annually in steelmaking and more than 100 ktonne in cement production. This study underscores the importance of international cooperation, outlining pathways for countries with abundant renewable resources (e.g., Canada, Australia) to emerge as major hydrogen producers, while nations with strong demand (e.g., Japan, South Korea) act as market catalysts. Finally, investment dynamics, government incentives, regulatory frameworks, and targeted policy recommendations are reviewed to provide a holistic perspective for building a resilient and sustainable hydrogen ecosystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207