MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415764115 · doi:10.29173/mocs315

Building Planning Capacity in the Offsite Construction Industry: Introducing the Theory of Constraints for Process Optimization

2025· article· W4415764115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOperations Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designProcess (computing)ScalabilityProduction (economics)Theory of constraintsProduction planningCapacity planningStrategic planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offsite construction (OSC) is a construction method that integrates two different paradigms, construction and manufacturing, and faces different challenges in production variability and demand synchronization. This study explores the application of the Theory of Constraints (TOC) as a strategic operation management framework to optimize manufacturing processes in the OSC industry. A five-step approach is presented to enhance production flow and reduce inefficiencies during the manufacturing stages. The study proposes a tailored framework incorporating TOC within the OSC environment, supported by metrics like cycle time and work-in-progress to detect and address bottlenecks. By emphasizing real-time data monitoring and continuous improvement, the framework highlights TOC’s ability to streamline production, reduce waste, and adapt dynamically to changing conditions, making it a critical methodology for improving adaptability, resilience, and scalability in offsite and modular construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it