MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415769855 · doi:10.26650/anar.1587423

A Group of Alkaline Glazed Ceramics from the Mardin Museum

2025· article· tr· W4415769855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murat Tosun

Bibliographic record

VenueAnadolu Araştırmaları / Anatolian Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlazeFeature (linguistics)CeramicQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates nine alkaline-glazed ceramics housed in the Mardin Museum, comprising four bottles, one pot, and four vases. The glaze characteristics of the bottles exhibit notable diversity: two feature a variegated greenish-blue glaze, one is double-glazed with a turquoise upper section and a dark blue lower section, comple mented by vertical dark blue stripes beneath the turquoise glaze, and one is dark green. In contrast, the pot and vases are uniformly characterized by a turquoise glaze. The alkaline glaze was applied to the outer surfaces of the ceramics and extended to the necks on the inside. However, it was not used for the inner surfaces or certain base sections of some specimens. Based on analogical research, the bottles classified under Type 1 are dated between the 3rd/2nd century BCE and the 3rd century CE (Seleucid/Parthian–Early Sasanian periods). Meanwhile, those under Types 1.2 and 1.3 span from the 3rd/2nd century BCE to the first quarter of the 3rd century CE (Seleucid/Parthian periods). The pot, classified as Type 2, is dated to the 2nd century BCE–2nd century CE. The vases, categorized under Type 3, are attributed to the 1st–2nd century CE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnadolu Araştırmaları / Anatolian ResearchSame topicCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisFrench-language works237,207