Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates nine alkaline-glazed ceramics housed in the Mardin Museum, comprising four bottles, one pot, and four vases. The glaze characteristics of the bottles exhibit notable diversity: two feature a variegated greenish-blue glaze, one is double-glazed with a turquoise upper section and a dark blue lower section, comple mented by vertical dark blue stripes beneath the turquoise glaze, and one is dark green. In contrast, the pot and vases are uniformly characterized by a turquoise glaze. The alkaline glaze was applied to the outer surfaces of the ceramics and extended to the necks on the inside. However, it was not used for the inner surfaces or certain base sections of some specimens. Based on analogical research, the bottles classified under Type 1 are dated between the 3rd/2nd century BCE and the 3rd century CE (Seleucid/Parthian–Early Sasanian periods). Meanwhile, those under Types 1.2 and 1.3 span from the 3rd/2nd century BCE to the first quarter of the 3rd century CE (Seleucid/Parthian periods). The pot, classified as Type 2, is dated to the 2nd century BCE–2nd century CE. The vases, categorized under Type 3, are attributed to the 1st–2nd century CE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".