MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415774580 · doi:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf117

Workflow and imaging strategies for real-time MR-guided atrial transseptal puncture

2025· article· en· W4415774580 on OpenAlexaff
Luuk H G A Hopman, Michiel J. B. Kemme, Pranav Bhagirath, Raschel D van Luijk, Vjeran Karloci, Cornelis P. Allaart, Marco Götte

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowInteratrial septumOrientation (vector space)Magnetic resonance imagingAtrial septumCatheter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interventional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (iCMR) offers distinct advantages for guiding complex cardiac procedures, including 3D visualization, soft tissue characterization, and avoidance of ionizing radiation. Transseptal puncture (TSP), essential for left heart access, poses specific challenges under MR-guidance. The development of MR-compatible TSP sets comprising non-ferromagnetic sheaths, dilators, and needles, represents a major step toward safe execution of TSP in the MRI environment. This report provides practical, step-by-step guidance for MR-guided TSP, focusing on imaging strategies and integration of advanced 2D and 3D navigation tools. Real-time cine imaging in dedicated planes enables precise localization of the fossa ovalis, confirmation of septal tenting, and avoidance of adjacent structures. Complementary use of a vendor-neutral MR-compatible 3D navigation system allows dynamic catheter tracking within a segmented static 3D anatomical shell, enhancing spatial orientation and procedural accuracy. Feasibility was demonstrated in a porcine model, where an MR-compatible sheath and trackable dilator were successfully navigated to the interatrial septum and TSP was achieved, enabling left atrial (LA) access. Subsequent mapping confirmed catheter positioning within the LA. Remaining challenges include limited guidewire visibility, low image temporal resolution compared with fluoroscopy, and the investigational status of current MR-compatible TSP sets. These factors must be addressed before clinical translation. In conclusion, MR-guided TSP using dedicated imaging planes and MR-compatible devices is technically feasible and may facilitate future radiation-free left heart interventions. Continued device refinement, including improved passive instrument visibility and active tracking technologies, faster real-time cine imaging, and regulatory approval are critical for safe and widespread clinical adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and PracticeSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207