MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415775646 · doi:10.1177/0192513x251356258

Mothering Disabled Children in Early Childhood: Institutional Reproduction of the Standard North American Family

2025· article· en· W4415775646 on OpenAlexafffund
Alice-Simone Balter, Kathryn Underwood, Janelle Brady

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family Issues · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityBrandon UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
KeywordsScholarshipContext (archaeology)ReproductionFeminismChild careCare workWork (physics)Ethnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers Smith’s ‘standard North American family’ (SNAF; 2005; 1999; 1993) to understand how early childhood systems uphold and reproduce gendered spaces of care for disabled children that also reify ableist, racist, and classist constructions of family and mothering. We present findings from an analysis of 25 mother and caregiver interviews over a 6–9 year time period, through which we have mapped the interactions that families have in the context of seeking support, education, and care for their disabled children. We draw on the scholarship of Black feminism and Critical Disability studies to shape our analysis of the gendered, raced, and classed work of families, and the institutional expectation on mothers to do the work of gaining access, and the lack of collective responsibility for all young children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family IssuesSame topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207