Conceptualizing peace and social justice in English language teaching: Moving forward toward <i>La Paz Total</i> in Colombia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the challenges faced by the English language teaching (ELT) field in Colombia in addressing issues of violence and social injustice through communicative skills. While Colombian education includes history and social studies courses that tackle these issues, ELT has struggled to integrate them meaningfully. To explore this gap, data were collected from a larger ethnographic project in a marginalized high school in Bogotá, where pedagogical practices centered on social justice and peace were examined. Framed by social justice and peacebuilding concepts, the study highlights how students’ understanding of these concepts is complex and interconnected. It reveals that teaching social justice and peace requires creating safe spaces for students to share their lived experiences, particularly in contexts of socioeconomic hardship. The article discusses the potential of language education to promote peace by fostering critical thinking and empowering students to engage with pressing social issues in conflict-affected settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it