Adaptive, Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Shear and Stoneley Wave Prediction Using Conformalized Ensemble Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The acquisition of shear (DTS) and Stoneley (DTST) wave transit times is indispensable for comprehensive reservoir characterization, yet it is often constrained by significant economic and operational limitations. This data gap has spurred the development of data-driven prediction models; however, a critical "credibility gap" persists. While modern machine learning (ML) models routinely achieve high point-accuracy metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), these metrics alone do not guarantee geologically plausible or reliable predictions for high-stakes engineering decisions, including wellbore stability analysis and hydraulic fracture design. This paper directly addresses this credibility gap by introducing and validating a robust and reliable workflow that moves beyond deterministic point estimates to provide rigorous, probabilistic forecasts. The proposed methodology couples high-performance, tree-based ensemble regressors with Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR), a framework that generates statistically valid, sample-specific prediction intervals without making restrictive distributional assumptions about the data or model errors. Validated using a comprehensive dataset from the geologically complex, heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs of the South Pars gas field, the study reveals nuanced model performance: Random Forest proves optimal for single-well prediction (R2 >0.94), whereas a Stacked Ensemble demonstrates superior robustness for inter-well generalization (R2 >0.92). Crucially, the CQR framework successfully generated adaptive 90% prediction intervals that achieved the target empirical coverage, confirming the method's validity. This work provides a practical, validated methodology to generate trustworthy, probabilistic forecasts of acoustic logs, enabling quantitative risk assessment and bridging the divide between high-accuracy ML and the reliability demands of modern geomechanical, petrophysical, and geophysical analysis and reservoir and drilling engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".