MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415777528 · doi:10.2118/229490-ms

Adaptive, Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Shear and Stoneley Wave Prediction Using Conformalized Ensemble Learning

2025· article· W4415777528 on OpenAlexaff
Hamzeh Ali Mohammadi, Sasan Mahmoodi, Asaad Abdollahzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUncertainty quantificationProbabilistic logicRobustness (evolution)Ensemble learningPrediction intervalEnsemble forecastingProbabilistic forecastingBayesian probabilityOutlierRegression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The acquisition of shear (DTS) and Stoneley (DTST) wave transit times is indispensable for comprehensive reservoir characterization, yet it is often constrained by significant economic and operational limitations. This data gap has spurred the development of data-driven prediction models; however, a critical "credibility gap" persists. While modern machine learning (ML) models routinely achieve high point-accuracy metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), these metrics alone do not guarantee geologically plausible or reliable predictions for high-stakes engineering decisions, including wellbore stability analysis and hydraulic fracture design. This paper directly addresses this credibility gap by introducing and validating a robust and reliable workflow that moves beyond deterministic point estimates to provide rigorous, probabilistic forecasts. The proposed methodology couples high-performance, tree-based ensemble regressors with Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR), a framework that generates statistically valid, sample-specific prediction intervals without making restrictive distributional assumptions about the data or model errors. Validated using a comprehensive dataset from the geologically complex, heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs of the South Pars gas field, the study reveals nuanced model performance: Random Forest proves optimal for single-well prediction (R2 >0.94), whereas a Stacked Ensemble demonstrates superior robustness for inter-well generalization (R2 >0.92). Crucially, the CQR framework successfully generated adaptive 90% prediction intervals that achieved the target empirical coverage, confirming the method's validity. This work provides a practical, validated methodology to generate trustworthy, probabilistic forecasts of acoustic logs, enabling quantitative risk assessment and bridging the divide between high-accuracy ML and the reliability demands of modern geomechanical, petrophysical, and geophysical analysis and reservoir and drilling engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→